Pre-Action Authorization for Autonomous AI

Models propose.
Synchronicity decides.

Synchronicity is the missing layer between an AI deciding to act and the action executing.

What it is

A neutral, non-executing governance authority that sits outside the AI system and decides whether each proposed action is allowed.

Neutral Non-executing External to the AI system

Every proposed action is canonicalized as a SPAD (Structured Proposed Action Descriptor) and submitted to Synchronicity before execution. Synchronicity evaluates against human-authored policy and returns PERMIT, DENY, or HOLD. It never executes the action itself; execution remains the exclusive domain of execution systems, which are architecturally prevented from acting without a valid signed decision artifact. Default-deny on failure. Every decision leaves a tamper-evident, replayable record.

Who it’s for

Regulated enterprises, AI assurance platforms, and procurement teams that need a defensible answer to one question: which rules governed this AI decision?

CISOS & GRC Auditable AI by design Every PERMIT, DENY, and HOLD is logged as the same event class. Regulators get a signed, replayable artifact for any decision they want to inspect.
PROCUREMENT Standards-conformity story ISO/IEC 42001, NIST AI RMF, EU AI Act, OWASP AISVS, NIST SP 800-207. Synchronicity provides the technical control substrate that conformity claims rest on.
PLATFORMS OEM and embedded integration Ship as a single Go binary, sidecar evaluator, or embedded library. GRC and AI assurance platforms can integrate the governance authority without rebuilding their stack.
Architecture briefing

Read the 34-problem capability map, or request an NDA briefing.

The capability map walks through the 34 governance problems the AI landscape is trying to solve and shows how one architecture addresses each. NDA briefings cover implementation detail and integration pathways.